New Study on Online Parental Controls from EU Kids Online:
A critical stance towards online parental controls is paramount as their functionalities cut both ways. Notwithstanding all good intentions, the use of parental controls has repercussions that not only involve opportunities with respect to children’s safety, but also threats that affect the trust relationship between the parent and child.
Parental controls should not be conceived of as helicopter apps
In their EU Kids Online research report, reviewing English language academic research on the topic of parental controls and children, Bieke Zaman and Marije Nouwen conclude that the majority of today’s parental controls are all about prevention, focusing on avoiding risks and restricting behaviour. However, (over-)controlling and (over)protective parenting practices may come with the unfortunate by-product that children are likely to miss out on online opportunities.
A one-sided focus on protection by means of prevention may even be detrimental to children’s rights and wellbeing. Preventing online activities from happening may, for instance, impede children’s right to benefit from online relationships, communications, explorations, information, etc. When restrictions are enforced by the parent without any explanation or negotiation, it is likely to worsen internal family dynamics. Big brother-like ‘spying’ behaviour through the use of parental controls may also involve the risk of revealing information about others.
Therefore, parental tools should not be conceived of as helicopter apps that serve the needs of parents who would like to ‘hover’ over their child wittingly or unwittingly at all costs. The potential of parental controls lies beyond mere preventive and protective functions. Since we can never fully protect children online, protective measures may include solutions that help children build more resilience to cope with the risk and harm they may encounter. Control and restrictive measures cannot achieve this goal.
How effective are parental controls?
As for the effectiveness of parental controls, Bieke Zaman and Marije Nouwen scrutinized the existing body of research to come to the conclusion that “We don’t know whether parental controls really work! Previous research on the use of parental controls has not yet reached a conclusive answer on their effectiveness in reducing children’s online risks.”
The question of whether or not they work can never yield a black or white answer. If parents decide to install parental controls, they will not integrate them in a similar way in the mix of parental mediation strategies, which tend to be complex, dynamic and often paradoxical in nature. Parents’ mediation practices depend on contextual demands, which evolve over time (see e.g., the rapidly changing popularity of a particular content or device) and vary between locations (e.g., more relaxing rules in the car or restaurant). Under certain circumstances, technologies serve as a substitute (e.g., as a ‘babysitter’), while under other they form the subject of parent-child interactions.
Recommendations for parents
Avoid overprotective parenting
- Parents should avoid over-controlling or overprotective parenting;
- Parents may not conceive parental controls as helicopter apps for ‘hovering’ over their children wittingly or unwittingly at all costs;
- Parents should be aware that punishments (e.g., prohibiting adolescents to use social media) do not teach children values or norms, and increase the likelihood of secret misbehaviour.
Be aware of ethical challenges
- Parents should discuss parental control settings with their child, as these settings will eventually affect children’s future (online) activities and privacy;
- Parents should be aware of the far reaching ethical consequences that the use of parental controls may present beyond the family unit. Monitoring children’s online behaviour may disclose information about children’s friends and other individuals.
Parental controls as a communication starter
- The use of parental controls may not be based on (c)overt control, but should focus on parental support and the creation of clear expectations instead;
- Parental controls should be understood as facilitators for parent-child discussions on what entails appropriate and inappropriate content and behaviours;
- Parents should be transparent in discussing their motives and intentions to use parental controls.
Recommendations for industry:
- Focus on digital literacy development in families with children
- Industry and app developers should integrate parental controls with the existing, but fragmented, educational initiatives that are spread over various websites, brochures and workshops.
- Building resilience
- Protective measures should also entail solutions that help children build resilience to cope with the harm and risks they may encounter.
- Facilitating opportunities
- The next generation of parental controls should provide more than setting limits, and also support parents in processes of (mutual) learning and (joint) engagement.
For more information:
The report “Parental controls: advice for parents, researchers and industry” updates and deepens the understanding of online parental controls by providing a understanding of the functionalities of parental controls to guide families with children and adolescents to use them wisely; A fine-grained analysis of the characteristics of technical mediation, to support parental mediation researchers in the development of up-to-date scales and analysis schemes; A substantiated analysis of the potential for the design of the next generation of parental controls that may inspire industry.
The full report is available here.
Information about the project and survey:
The EU Kids Online network has been funded by the EC Safer Internet Programme in three successive phases of work from 2006–14 to enhance knowledge of children’s and parents’ experiences and practices regarding risky and safer use of the internet and new online technologies.
As a major part of its activities, EU Kids Online conducted a face-to-face, in-home survey during 2010 of 25,000 9- to 16-year-old internet users and their parents in 25 countries, using a stratified random sample and self-completion methods for sensitive questions.
Now including researchers and stakeholders from 33 countries in Europe and beyond, the network continues to analyse and update the evidence base to inform policy.
For all reports, findings and technical survey information, as well as full details of national partners, please visit www.eukidsonline.net
For more information on the Belgian team in EU Kids Online, we refer to http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/ParticipatingCountries/belgium.aspx